You are at the new home of Arunachal Diary and Arunachal Diary is in midst of moving to it’s new home i.e., self hosted platform. So, till the new site is straightened out, do bear with us.
In the meantime, if you feel like accessing earlier posts and comments, visit here. All the posts and comments have been imported.
We are sorry for the inconvenience caused. We’d be back soon. Do keep visiting.
Update:
Almost done. All the posts and comments have been imported. The theme has been modified. If the connectivity remains as it is as is now, hope to straighten out Arunachal Diary in a couple of hours or so.

How much is "enough"?
When it comes to Arunachal Politicos’, it seems sky is the limit of their desires/requirements. Why would an individual need 50 or 25 or for that matter even 1o gun licenses?
In its’ September 26th edition, The Arunachal Times reported that Education Minister Tatar Kipa, sitting MLA Lokam Tassar and ex-Minister Kafa Bengia had got issued 50, 10 and 25 arms license respectively against their names vide government order dated August 24th under special quota; barely a week before the enforcement of Model Code of Conduct. This has drawn the attention of Arunachal Pradesh Trinamool Congress Party who questioned the state Chief Secretary regarding issuance of the same and has sought action against the issuing authority.
The issuance of such large number of arms license has raised so many questions in my mind? Why would any politico need such large cache of arms? For personal security? But why 50 or 25 or 10 and not 1? Has it got anything to do with the assembly polls slated for October 13th? If issuance of such large number of arms licenses to an individual (even under special quota) is permissible under Arms Act/Rule? (I would need an input on this from legal experts.) Whatever I’ve read or come across about the Arms Act/Rule, there is provision of only 3 (three) arms to be possessed or carried by an individual. So, has the issuing authority flaunted the Act/Rule?